Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (2505MHz vs 2150MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
13056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +313%
91.06 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
5120
568
TMUs
320
192
ROPs
128
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
80
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Navi 21
AD102
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy