Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD Radeon R7 240

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 221% (2505MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
17856 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +18148%
91.06 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
320
568
TMUs
20
192
ROPs
8
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Oland
AD102
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy