NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1627MHz vs 1545MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+42%
9.492 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A1000 Embedded
1297
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+68%
2185
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
2048
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
64
Tensor Cores
384
16
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
TU104B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
13.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
