CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1816MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
+2103%
9.3 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
VS
Quadro FX 3800M
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
652 MHz
Base Clock
-
1816 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
87.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
145.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
5.837 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.3 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
60W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation
2
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
3
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
4
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
5
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
6
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
7
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
8
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
9
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
10
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy