Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1140MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (132.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB +696%
5.837 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

652 MHz
Base Clock
-
1140 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
132.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
91.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
5.837 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.837 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy