Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1831MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Mobile +11094%
7.5 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
1831 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

89.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
117.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
4.669 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.5 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
72.96 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy