Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

NVIDIA RTX A1000 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1462MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 +735%
6.737 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

727 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy