NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+67%
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
7680
80
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
120
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
