Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2100MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +1879%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
19456
80
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
146 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy