CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+260%
8.253 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
GRID K260Q
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
60W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy