CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+272%
8.253 TFLOPS
GRID M6 8Q
2.218 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
GRID M6 8Q
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.21 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.31 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.218 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
69.31 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
398 mm²
Board Design
60W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
2
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
5
NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy