NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1342%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded
+6570%
2001
Quadro K2000M
30
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2158%
271
Quadro K2000M
12
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
