NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 78W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2847%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
112
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
