CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 78W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2847%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
Quadro FX 3700
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
112
80
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy