NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1612MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+177%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded
+766%
2001
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded
+401%
271
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
9
2560
Shading Units
1152
80
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
