NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+2244%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
