CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+1855%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
Quadro FX 3800M
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
60W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
2
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
5
NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
7
NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K1
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K560Q
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy