Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1612MHz vs 1550MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 450W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
More VRAM (96GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1350 +438%
44.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
750 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
14336
80
TMUs
896
48
ROPs
0
80
Tensor Cores
896
20
RT Cores
112
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
450W
-
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
100 billion
Unknown
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net