Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 44.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +1422%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro K1100M
0.542 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded +5963%
2001
Quadro K1100M
33

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
44.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.648 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.59 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
542.2 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.59 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net