Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (1612MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +1126%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
837 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.87 billion
Unknown
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net