NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+28358%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
