Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1612MHz vs 1404MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +64%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded +404%
2001
Quadro P3200 Max Q
397
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded +218%
271
Quadro P3200 Max Q
85

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net