NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 128MB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 60W)
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2006
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
31W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
NV43
-
GPU Variant
NVS440 NPB
Ampere
Architecture
Curie
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
110 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.146 billion
Unknown
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0
