NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1612MHz vs 1395MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16
+21%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
56
2560
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
448
20
RT Cores
56
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
