NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1612MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 165W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile
+169%
22.27 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded
2001
RTX A5500 Mobile
+67%
3342
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded
271
RTX A5500 Mobile
+43%
389
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
58
2560
Shading Units
7424
80
TMUs
232
48
ROPs
96
80
Tensor Cores
232
20
RT Cores
58
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
165W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GA103
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
22 billion
Unknown
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
