NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs AMD Radeon E6760 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB and 1024MB VRAM Radeon E6760 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1177MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E6760 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+946%
6.026 TFLOPS
Radeon E6760 MXM
0.576 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1177 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
94.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
6.026 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.026 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
576.0 GFLOPS
94.16 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks XT
(215-0803000)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
