NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1680MHz vs 1177MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
6.026 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+442%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
607 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1177 MHz
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
76
2560
Shading Units
9728
80
TMUs
304
48
ROPs
112
80
Tensor Cores
304
20
RT Cores
76
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
94.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
6.026 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
6.026 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
94.16 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD103
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
