Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Intel Arc A380M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Intel Arc A380M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
1536 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (2000MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +50%
6.18 TFLOPS
Arc A380M
4.096 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2023
Ampere-MW
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
1550 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
128
20
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net