NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W4150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1207MHz vs 850MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+847%
6.18 TFLOPS
FirePro W4150M
0.652 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Ampere-MW
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
850 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.800 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.40 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
652.8 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Mars
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
