Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1207MHz vs 1125MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +34%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB
4.608 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
757 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
64
20
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.608 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net