NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1677%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
8
2560
Shading Units
256
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
