Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1358MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +705%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy