Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +10277%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
32
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy