NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+12791%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
4
2560
Shading Units
32
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
