NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+2240%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2007
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
24
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
171W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G80
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
90 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.0
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
