NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1687MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1149%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Feb 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
-
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
12
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
