NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 93% (1687MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+1183%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000 Mobile
+645%
4917
Quadro M600M
660
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
837 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.008 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
672.8 GFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
21.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
