NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 75% (2100MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X
+1945%
163.4 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
19456
104
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
MI300
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
12 billion
Transistors
146 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A
