Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +9883%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
4
3328
Shading Units
32
104
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
G84
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy