Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +1543%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
8
3328
Shading Units
256
104
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
142W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GF100
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy