CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
3312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+16893%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
VS
Quadro FX 380M
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
2
3328
Shading Units
16
104
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GT218
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K8
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy