CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 140M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
3312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+30619%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 140M
0.026 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
VS
Quadro NVS 140M
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
2
3328
Shading Units
16
104
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
10W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
G86
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
G86-740-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1070
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy