NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+989%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
384
104
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
51W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GK107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
