NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+268%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
1536
104
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
122W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GK104
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
