Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1785MHz vs 1200MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +118%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
16
3328
Shading Units
1024
104
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
TU117
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
12 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy