Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1700MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
10752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +499%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
14080
104
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
12 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy