CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000
Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1200MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+84%
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
8192
104
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
DG2-512
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
12 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA L40
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy