NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A4 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4 Mobile
+1618%
7.25 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1297 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
7.250 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
