NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A4 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4 Mobile
+10720%
7.25 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1297 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
7.250 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
