Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +6342%
2.706 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy