Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)

Score

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV380
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Rage 9
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
130 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
-
© 2025 - TopCPU.net