Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2007
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
R500
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy